Crucial Conversations was written by Kerry Patterson and Joseph Grenny in 2002. It is a great resource for thinking about how conversations play a huge role in our lives and how a few key (4-7) conversations in our lives will ultimately determine the course of our lives. The problem is we aren't that good at conversations usually and we never know when the crucial conversations are going to happen. How can we prepare our minds, emotions, and will to be ready for the crucial conversations that we will innevitably enter.
The content below is taken directly from the book Crucial Conversations. It highlights key insights from each chapter.
  1. What's a crucial conversation and who cares?
  2. The Power of Dialogue
  3. Start with Heart
  4. Learn to Look
  5. Make it Safe
  6. Master my Stories
  7. STATE my Path
  8. Explore Others' Paths
  9. Move to Action
  10. Putting it All Together
  11. Yeah, But
  12. Change Your Life


Chapter 1: What's a Crucial Conversation and Who Cares?

What defines a crucial conversation? There are 3 characteristics of a crucial conversation:

  1. Opinions Vary – Talking to your boss about a possible promotion and your boss doesn’t think you’re not ready; you think you are.
  2. Stakes are High – Reviewing bills with your spouse and trying to determine how to reduce expenses or bring in more income in order to make ends meet.
  3. Emotions run high – Discussing building a fence with your neighbor ends with your neighbor threatening you with a law-suit and you insulting him.

The results of crucial conversations can have a huge impact on your daily life. Not every conversation you have is a crucial one, but every conversation is important. If you handle even a seemingly insignificant conversation poorly, you establish a habit of behavior that shows up in all of your crucial conversations.

By Definition Crucial Conversations are about tough issues. Unfortunately it's human nature to back away from discussions we fear will hurt us or make things worse. When it comes to crucial conversations, there are 3 ways of handling them:

  1. We avoid them
  2. We face them and handle them poorly
  3. We face them and handle them well

When conversations matter the most, that is, when conversations move from casual to crucial, we're generally on our worst behavior.

We're designed wrong

There is something about crucial conversations that triggers flight or fight in us rather than "intelligent persuassion and gentle attentiveness." An example is given of someone saying something you disagree with about a topic you care a great deal about. The hair on your neck stands up, but that's not all. Adreneline is pumped directly into your bloodstream. You don't decide to do it; it just happens and you have to deal with it. Your brain then diverts blood from non-essential functions to essential...and you don't get to decide which is essential and which is not.

We're under pressure

Crucial conversations are usually spontaneous. We're usually caught by surprise. No books no coaches. All you have to deal with is the issue at hand, other person, and a brain that's ready to fight or flight. We end up doing and saying things that seemed good at the time, but later seem...stupid.

We're stumped

To make things more difficult, you don't know where to start. Let's say you've planned for a conversation. Will you succeed? Not necessarily. Without a proper model of behavior, all the wrong ways of handling a situation may only tell us how not to act, but not how to act. So, you wing it. It's little wonder, when it matters most, we're at our worst behavior.

We act in self-defeating ways

We can act as our own worst enemies and we don't even realize it. The more we snap at people, the less they want to be around us. The more they don't want to be around us, the more we snap at them. It's a vicious cycle and we're creating the problem ourselves.



Chapter 2: The Power of Dialogue

The definition of Dialogue is to "take part in a conversation or discussion to resolve a problem."

A dialogue differs from a monologue in that it engages two or more parties instead of one party talking at another party. We engage in monologues often enough. But how often do we really engage in a dialogue and hear out the other person we're talking to? Dialogue is not just two or more parties talking back and forth though. It involves the resolution of a problem and that is a tricky business.

There is one thing that identifies those who are skilled in the power of dialogue.

"When it comes to risky, controversial, and emotional conversations, skilled people find a way get all relevant information, from themselves and others, out into the open. That's it. At the core of every successful conversation lies the free flow of relevant information. People openly and honestly express their opinions, share their feelings, and articulate their theories. They willingly and capably share their views, even when their ideas are controversial or unpopular. It's the one thing"

That is a powerful assessment of successful crucial conversations. This is dubbed "The one thing" but it is really a number of things wrapped up into one.

 

  • A focus on relevant information.
  • Placing all relevant information from yourself into the open.
  • Drawing all relevant information from others into the open.
  • Allowing all relevant information to flow freely, without some information trumping the rest.
  • Being open and honest.
  • Expressing opinions.
  • Sharing feelings.
  • Articulating theories.
  • Willingly & Capably sharing views.
  • Not being ashamed of ideas that are controversial or unpopular.

Now, that’s a long list of things to get right in conversations. It could even be broadened. However, the point is not to overwhelm ourselves with how much goes into a successfully navigating a crucial conversation. Rather, the point is to draw our attention to what elements need our personal attention.

What elements listed above do you identify as a weak point in your conversational skills? Personally, I struggle with drawing all relevant information from others into the open. Also, I struggle with not being ashamed of ideas that are controversial or unpopular.

The skills required to master high stakes interactions are quite easy to spot and moderately easy to learn. Consider the fact that a crucial conversation all but leaps out at you. Dialogue skills are not only easy to spot, but their fairly easy to learn.

First, we'll explore the tools people use to create the conditions of dialogue. The focus is how we think about problem situations and what we do to prepare for them.

Next, we'll examine the tools for talking, listening, and acting together. This is what most people have in mind when they think about crucial conversations. How do I express delicate feedback? How do I speak persuasively, not abrasively? Or how about listening? Or better yet, how can we get people to talk when they seem nervous? And how do we move from thought to action?

Finally, we'll tie all of the theories and skills together by providing both a model and an example. Then to see if you can really do what it takes, we provide several situations that give most of us fits, even people who are gifted at dialogue. You will master the tools for talking when stakes are high.


Chapter 3: Start with Heart

Examine yourself

Let's assume we need to start with our own personal dialogue skills.

Where do we start? How can we stay clear of unhealthy games?

 

Skilled people start with heart.

They begin high risk discussions with the right motives and they stay focused no matter what happens. They maintain this focus in 2 ways.

1st, they're steely eyed smart when it comes to knowing what they want.

2nd, they don't make Suckers Choices; either or choices.

As you start talking about a hot topic with someone who disagrees with you, start by examining your motives. Going in ask yourself what you really want.

In the middle of a crucial conversation, as you start to defer to authority or give your spouse the cold shoulder, pay attention to what's happening to your objectives. Are you starting to change your goal to save face, avoid embarrassment, win, be right, or punish others? Here's the tricky part, our motives usually change without any conscious thought on our part. 

To engage in dialogue despite the emotional impacts, you must step away from the interaction and look on yourself, like an outsider. Ask yourself, "What am I doing and if I had to guess, what does it tell me about my underlying motive?" If you're honest you might see, "I'm pushing hard, making the argument stronger than I actually believe, and doing anything to win. I've shifted from trying to select a vacation location to trying to win an argument."

Once you call into question the shifting desires of your heart, you can make conscious choices to change them. "What I really want is to genuinely select a vacation spot we can all enjoy, rather than try to win people over to my ideas." When you name the game, you can stop playing it. How? Stop and ask yourself some questions that return you to dialogue.

What do I really want for myself?

What do I really want for others?

What do I really want for the relationship?

How would I behave if I really wanted these results?

 

Find your bearings

There are 2 good reasons for asking these questions.

First, the answer to these question helps us to find our North Star. Rather than get distracted by people who want to argue and your own bend to be right, answering these questions returns us to what is important.

 

Take Charge of your body

The second reason is no less important than the first. Asking what we want changes our physiology. As we introduce abstract and complex questions to our mind, the problem solving part of our brain recognizes that we are now dealing with intricate social issues and not physical threats. When we present our brain with a demanding question, our body sends precious blood to the parts of our brain that help us think and away from the parts of our body that help us take flight or begin a fight.

 

As we step up to a crucial conversation, many of us quickly change our original objectives to much less healthy goals. Common, but unhealthy goals may include: Wanting to win, Seeking revenge, & Hoping to remain safe.

 

Avoid the tactic of a Suckers Choice

Let's add one more tool that helps us focus on what we really want. The Suckers Choice is saying that there is no choice except to behave poorly. In order to justify an especially sorded behavior, we suggest that we're caught between two distasteful options. Either we can be honest and attack our spouse or we can be kind and with-hold the truth. Either we can disagree with the boss to help make a better choice and get shot for it or we can remain quiet, starve the pool of meaning, and keep our job. Pick your poison. These are Suckers Choices because they are always set up as the only two options available. It's the worst of either/or thinking. The person making the Suckers Choice doesn't suggest maybe there is a third option that doesn't call for unhealthy behavior. For example, maybe there’s a way to be honest and respectful. Perhaps we can express our candid opinion to our boss and be safe. Suckers Choices are simplistic tradeoffs that keep us from thinking creatively of ways to get to dialogue and that justify our silly games.

The best at dialogue refuse Suckers Choices by setting up new choices

How do we break away from perverted logic that keeps us trapped in hurtful behavior?

Those skilled at dialogue present themselves with tougher questions; questions that turn the either/or choice into a search for the all-important and ever-elusive AND.

First, clarify what you REALLY want. If you know what you want for yourself, others and the relationship, then you're in a position to break out of the suckers choice.

Second, clarify what you really DON'T want. This is the key to framing the AND question. Think of what you're afraid will happen to you if you back away from your current strategy of trying to win or stay safe. What horrible outcome makes game playing an attractive and sensible option? "What I don't want is to have a useless and heated conversation that creates bad feelings and doesn't lead to change."

Third, present your brain with a more complex problem. Combine the first two into an AND question that forces you to search for more creative and productive options than silence and violence. "How can I have a more candid conversation AND avoid creating bad feelings or wasting our time?"


Chapter 4: Learn to Look

When caught up in a crucial conversation, it's difficult to see exactly what's going on and why. When a discussion starts to become stressful, we often end up doing the exact opposite of what works. We turn to the less healthy components of our style under stress.

To break from this insidious cycle, Learn to Look.

  • Learn to look at content and conditions
  • Look for when things become crucial
  • Learn to watch for safety problems
  • Look to see if others are moving toward silence or violence
  • Look for outbreaks of your Style Under Stress


Chapter 5: Make It Safe

When others move to silence or violence, step out of the conversation and Make it Safe. When safety is restored, go back to the issue at hand and continue the dialogue.

  • Step out
  • Make it Safe
  • Then step back in

Decide which condition of Safety is at Risk

  • Mutual Purpose
  • Do others believe I care about their goals in this conversation?
  • Do they trust my motives?
  • Mutual Respect
  • Do others believe I respect them?

Apologize when appropriate

  • When you've clearly violated respect, apologize.

Contrast to Fix Misunderstanding

  • Address others' concerns that you don't respect them or that you have a malicious purpose
  • Confirms your respect or clarifies your real purpose

CRIB to get Mutual Purpose - When you are at cross-purposes, use four skills to get back to Mutual Purpose:

  • Commit to Seek Mutual Purpose
  • Recognize the Purpose behind the Strategy
  • Invent a Mutual Purpose
  • Brainstorm New Strategies


Chapter 6: Master My Stories

How to Stay in Dialogue When You're Angry, Scared, or Hurt

Stories create feelings. There is an intermediate step between what others do and how we feel. Just after we observe what others do and just before we feel some emotion about it, we tell ourselves a story. That is, we add a meaning to the action we observed. We add Motive (why did they do that?) and Judgment (is that good or bad?). Then, based on the story we tell ourselves, we respond with an emotion.

This relates to the First Habit of being Proactive. Between the Stimulus and the Response, there is a gap where we have a choice to make. The stories we tell ourselves, whether they are accurate or not, determine our response. We must proactively tell ourselves the right stories, to have the right response.

Skills for Mastering our Stories

Slow down and take charge of your Path to Action.

Retrace Your Path

  1. Notice Your Behavior - Am I in some form of silence or violence? You must take an honest look at what you're doing. If you tell yourself a story that your violent behavior is a "necessary tactic," you won't see the need to reconsider your actions. If you immediately jump in with "they started it," or otherwise find yourself rationalizing your behavior, you also won't feel compelled to change. Rather than stop and review what you're doing, you'll devote your time to justifying your actions to yourself and others. When an unhelpful story is driving you to silence or violence, stop and consider how others would see your actions.
  2. Get in Touch with Your Feelings - What emotions are encouraging me to act this way? Identifying your emotions is more difficult than you might imagine. When asked to describe how they're feeling, they use words such as "bad" or "angry" or "frightened"-which would be okay if these were accurate descriptors, but often they're not. Individuals say they're angry when, in fact, they're feeling a mix of embarrassment and surprise. Or they suggest they're unhappy when they're feeling violated. Perhaps they suggest they're upset when they're really feeling humiliated and cheated. Since life doesn't consist of a series of vocabulary tests, you might wonder what difference words can make. But words do matter. Knowing what you're really feeling helps you take a more accurate look at what is going on and why
  3. Analyze Your Stories - What story is creating these emotions? Once you've identified what you're feeling, you have to stop and ask, given the circumstances, is it the right feeling? Challenge the illusion that what you're feeling is the only right emotion under the circumstances. Don't confuse Stories with Facts. Your stories are not facts even if they feel like facts. This is where the words we use are so important.
  4. Get back to the facts - What evidence do I have to support this story? Separate fact from story by focusing on behavior. Can you see or hear this thing you're calling a fact? Spot the story by watching for "hot" words. For example when assessing the fact, you might say, "She scowled at me" or "He made a sarcastic comment." Words such as "scowl" and "sarcastic" are hot terms. They express judgment and attributions that, in turn, create strong emotions. They are story, not fact. Notice how much different it is when you say: "Her eyes pinched shut and her lips tightened," as opposed to "She scowled at me."

Watch for Three "Clever" Stories

These stories are clever because they allow us to feel good about behaving badly. Better yet, they allow us to feel good about behaving badly even while achieving abysmal results. Among all of the clever stories we tell, here are the three most common.

  1. Victim Stories - "It's not my fault" - Victim Stories, as you might imagine, make us out to be innocent sufferers. The other person is bad and wrong, and we are good and right. Other people do bad things, and we suffer as a result. When you tell a Victim Story, you ignore the role you played in the problem. You tell your story in a way that judiciously avoids facts about whatever you have done (or neglected to do) that might have contributed to the problem.
  2. Villain Stories - "It's all your fault" - We create these nasty little tales by turning normal, decent human beings into villains. In Victim Stories we exaggerate our own innocence. In Villain Stories we overemphasize the other person's guilt. We automatically assume the worst possible motives while ignoring any possible good or neutral intentions a person may have. Watch out for the double standard. When you pay attention to Victim and Villain Stories and catch them for what they are unfair characterizations-you begin to see the terrible double standard we use when our emotions are out of control. When we make mistakes, we tell a Victim Story by claiming our intentions were innocent and pure. On the other hand, when others do things that hurt us, we tell Villain Stories in which we invent terrible motives for others based on how their actions affected us.
  3. Helpless Stories - "There's Nothing Else I can do" - In these fabrications we make ourselves out to be powerless to do anything. We convince ourselves that there are no healthy alternatives for dealing with our predicament, which justifies the action we're about to take.

Why We Tell Clever Stories

  1. They Match Reality - Sometimes the stories we tell are accurate. It's rare, but sometimes they are true.
  2. They Get Us Off the Hook More often than not, our conclusions transform from reasonable explanations to clever stories when they conveniently excuse us from any responsibility-when, in reality, we have been partially responsible.
  3. Clever stories keep us from acknowledging our own sellouts - By now it should be clear that clever stories cause us problems. A reasonable question at this point is, "If they're so terribly hurtful, why do we ever tell clever stories?" like it or not, we usually don't begin telling stories that justify our actions until we have done something that we feel a need to justify. If we don't admit to our errors, we inevitably look for ways to justify them. That's when we begin to tell clever stories.

Tell the Rest of the Story

Once we've learned to recognize the clever stories we tell ourselves, we can move to the final Master My Stories skill. The dialogue-smart recognize that they're telling clever stories, stop, and then do what it takes to tell a useful story. A useful story, by definition, creates emotions that lead to healthy action-such as dialogue.

  1. Turn Victims into actors - If you notice that you're talking about yourself as an innocent victim (and you weren't held up at gunpoint), ask: "Am I pretending not to notice my role in the problem?"
  2. Turn Villains into Humans - When you find yourself labeling or otherwise vilifying others, stop and ask: "Why would a reasonable, rational, and decent person do what this person is doing?"
  3. Turn the Helpless into the Able - Finally, when you catch yourself bemoaning your own helplessness, you can tell the complete story by returning to your original motive. To do so, stop and ask: "What do I really want? For me? For others? For the Relationship?"

Then kill the Sucker's Choice that's made you feel helpless to choose anything other than silence or violence. Do this by asking: "What would I do right now if I really wanted these results?"

When you refuse to make yourself helpless, you're forced to hold yourself accountable for using your dialogue skills rather than bemoaning your weakness.


Chapter 7: STATE My Path

How to Speak Persuasively, Not Abrasively

Sharing Risky Meaning

Adding information to the pool of meaning can be quite difficult when the ideas we're about to dump into the collective consciousness contain delicate, unattractive, or controversial opinions.

When it comes to sharing touchy information, the worst alternate between bluntly dumping their ideas into the pool and saying nothing at all. The best at dialogue speak their minds completely and do it in a way that makes it safe for others to hear what they have to say and respond to it as well. They are both totally frank and completely respectful.

Maintain Safety

How can we speak the unspeakable and still maintain respect? Actually, it can be done if you know how to carefully blend three ingredients-confidence, humility, and skill.

  1. Confidence - People who are skilled at dialogue have the confidence to say what needs to be said to the person who needs to hear it. They are confident that their opinions deserve to be placed in the pool of meaning. They are also confident that they can speak openly without brutalizing others or causing undue offense.
  2. Humility - Skilled people are confident that they have something to say, but also realize that others have valuable input. They are humble enough to realize that they don't have a monopoly on the truth. They may currently believe something but realize that with new information they may change their minds.
  3. Skill - Finally, people who willingly share delicate information are good at doing it. That's why they're confident in the first place. They don't make a Sucker's Choice because they've found a path that allows for both candor and safety. They speak the unspeakable, and people are grateful for their honesty.

STATE My Path

Share your facts

In the last chapter we suggested that if you retrace your Path to Action to the source, you eventually arrive at the facts.

  • Facts are the least controversial. Facts provide a safe beginning. By their very nature, facts aren't controversial.
  • Facts are the most persuasive. In addition to being less controversial, facts are also more persuasive than subjective conclusions. Facts form the foundation of belief. So if you want to persuade others, don't start with your stories. Start with your observations.
  • Facts are the least insulting. If you do want to share your story, don't start with it. Your story (particularly if it has led to a rather ugly conclusion) could easily surprise and insult others. It could kill safety in one rash, ill-conceived sentence.
  • Begin your path with facts. In order to talk about your stories, you need to lead the others involved down your Path to Action. Let them experience your path from the beginning to the end, and not from the end to-well, to wherever it takes you. Let others see your experience from your point of view-starting with your facts. This way, when you do talk about what you’re starting to conclude, they’ll understand why. First the facts, the story-and make sure that as you explain your story, you tell it as a possible story, not as concrete evidence.

Tell your story

Even if you've started with your facts, the other person can still become defensive when you move from facts to stories. After all, you're sharing potentially unflattering conclusions and judgments.

  • It takes confidence. By thinking through the facts and then leading with them, you're much more likely to have the confidence you need to add controversial and vitally important meaning to the shared pool.
  • Don't pile it on. Sometimes we lack the confidence to speak up, so we let problems simmer for a long time. Given the chance, we generate a whole arsenal of unflattering conclusions.
  • Look for safety problems. As you share your story, watch for signs that safety is deteriorating. If people start becoming defensive or appear to be insulted, step out of the conversation and rebuild safety by Contrasting.
  • Use Contrasting. Be careful not to apologize for your views. Remember, the goal of Contrasting is not to water down your message, but to be sure that people don't hear more than you intend. Be confident enough to share what you really want to express.

Ask for others' paths

We mentioned that the key to sharing sensitive ideas is a blend of confidence and humility. We express our confidence by sharing our facts and stories clearly. We demonstrate our humility by then asking others to share their views.

To find out others' views on the matter, encourage them to express their facts, stories, and feelings. Then carefully listen to what they have to say. Equally important, be willing to abandon or shape your story as more information pours into the Pool of Shared Meaning.

Talk tentatively

Talking tentatively simply means that we tell our story as a story rather than disguising it as a fact. "Perhaps you were unaware..." suggests that you're not absolutely certain. "In my opinion . . ." says you're sharing an opinion and no more. When sharing a story, strike a blend between confidence and humility. Share in a way that expresses appropriate confidence in your conclusions while demonstrating that, if appropriate, you want your conclusions challenged. To do so, change "The fact is" to "In my opinion." Swap "Everyone knows that" for "I've talked to three of our suppliers who think that." Soften "It's clear to me" to "I'm beginning to wonder if."

Why soften the message? Because we're trying to add meaning to the pool, not force it down other people's throats. If we're too forceful, the information won't make it into the pool.

Tentative, not wimpy. Some people are so worried about being too forceful or pushy that they err in the other direction. They wimp out by making still another Sucker's Choice. They figure that the only safe way to share touchy data is to act as if it's not important.

When you begin with a complete disclaimer and do it in a tone that suggests you're consumed with doubt, you do the message a disservice. It's one thing to be humble and open. It's quite another to be clinically uncertain. Use language that says you're sharing an opinion, not language that says you're a nervous wreck.

Encouraging testing

When you ask others to share their paths, how you phrase your invitation makes a big difference. Not only should you invite others to talk, but you have to do so in a way that makes it clear that no matter how controversial their ideas are, you want to hear them. Others need to feel safe sharing their observations and stories-even if they differ. Otherwise, they don't speak up and you can't test the accuracy and relevance of your views.

  • Invite opposing views. So if you think others may be hesitant, make it clear that you want to hear their views-no matter their opinion. If they disagree, so much the better. If what they have to say is controversial or even touchy, respect them for finding the courage to express what they're thinking. If they have different facts or stories, you need to hear them to help complete the picture.
  • Mean it. Sometimes people offer an invitation that sounds more like a threat than a legitimate call for opinions. "Well, that's how I see it. Nobody disagrees, do they?" Invite people with both words and tone that say "I really want to hear from you."
  • Play devil's advocate. Occasionally you can tell that others are not buying into your facts or story, but they're not speaking up either. You've sincerely invited them, even encouraged differing views, but nobody says anything. To help grease the skids, play devil's advocate. Model disagreeing by disagreeing with your own view. "Maybe I'm wrong here. What if the opposite is true? What if the reason sales have dropped is because . . ."


Chapter 8: Explore Others' Paths

How to Listen when Others Blow Up or Clam Up

In Chapter 5 we recommended that whenever you notice safety is at risk, you should step out of the conversation and restore it . When you have offended others through a thoughtless act, apologize. Or if someone has misunderstood your intent, use Contrasting. Explain what you do and don't intend. Finally, if you're simply at odds, find a Mutual Purpose. Now we add one more skill: Explore Others ' Paths. Since we've added a model of what's going on inside another person's head (the Path to Action), we now have a whole new tool for helping others feel safe. If we can find a way to let others know that it's okay to share their Path to Action-their facts, and even their nasty stories and ugly feelings, then they'll be more likely to open up.

Start with Heart-Get Ready to listen

Be sincere. To get at others' facts and stories, we have to invite them to share what's on their minds. We'll look at how to do this in a minute. For now, let's highlight the point that when you do invite people to share their views, you must mean it.

Be curious. When you do want to hear from others (and you should because it adds to the pool of meaning), the best way to get at the truth is by making it safe for them to express the stories that are moving them to either silence or violence. This means that at the very moment when most people become furious, we need to become curious. Rather than respond in kind, we need to wonder what's behind the ruckus.

Stay curious. When people begin to share their volatile stories and feelings, we now face the risk of pulling out our own Victim, Villain, and Helpless Stories to help us explain why they're saying what they're saying. Unfortunately, since it's rarely fun to hear other people's unflattering stories, we begin to assign negative motives to them for telling the stories.

Encourage Others to Retrace Their Path

Once you've decided to maintain a curious approach, it's time to help the other person retrace his or her Path to Action. Unfortunately, most of us fail to do so. That's because when others start playing silence or violence games, we're joining the conversation at the end of their Path to Action.

Every sentence has a history. To get a feel for how complicated and unnerving this process is, remember how you felt the last time your favorite mystery show started late because a football game ran long. As the game wraps up, the screen cross-fades from a trio of announcers to a starlet standing over a murder victim. Along the bottom of the screen are the discomforting words, "We now join this program already in progress."

Break the cycle. And then guess what happens? When we're on the receiving end of someone's retributions, accusations, and cheap shots, rarely do we think: "My, what an interesting story he or she must have told. What do you suppose led to that?" Instead, we match this unhealthy behavior. Our defense mechanisms kick in, and we create our own hasty and ugly Path to Action.

POWER UP

When? So far we've suggested that when other people appear to have a story to tel l and facts to share, it's our job to invite them to do so. Our cues are simple: Others are going to silence or violence. We can see that they're feeling upset, fearful, or angry. We can see that if we don't get at the source of their feelings, we'll end up suffering the effects of the feelings . These external reactions are our cues to do whatever it takes to help others retrace their Paths to Action.

How? We've also suggested that whatever we do to invite the other person to open up and share his or her path, our invitation must be sincere. As hard as it sounds, we must be sincere in the

face of hostility, fear, or even abuse-which leads us to the next question.

What? What are we supposed to actually do ? What does it take to get others to share their path-stories and facts alike? In a word, it requires listening. In order for people to move from acting on their feelings to talking about their conclusions and observations, we must listen in a way that makes it safe for others to share their intimate thoughts. They must believe that when they share their thoughts, they won't offend others or be punished for speaking frankly.

AMPP

To encourage others to share their paths we'll use four power listening tools that can help make it safe for other people to speak frankly. We call the four skills power listening tools because they are best remembered with the acronym AMPP-Ask, Mirror, Paraphrase, and Prime. Luckily, the tools work for both silence and violence games.

Ask to Get Things Rolling - The easiest and most straightforward way to encourage others to share their Path to Action is simply to invite them to express themselves. For example, often all it takes to break an impasse is to seek to understand others' views. When we show genuine interest, people feel less compelled to use silence or violence.

Mirror to Confirm Feelings - If asking others to share their path doesn't open things up, mirroring can help build more safety. In mirroring, we take the portion of the other person's Path to Action we have access to and make it safe for him or her to discuss it. All we have so far are actions and some hints about the other person's emotions, so we start there.

Paraphrase to Acknowledge the Story - Asking and mirroring may help you get part of the other person's story out into the open. When you get a clue about why the person is feeling as he or she does, you can build additional safety by paraphrasing what you've heard. Be careful not to simply parrot back what was said. Instead, put the message in your own words-usually in an abbreviated form.

Prime When You're Getting Nowhere - On the other hand, there are times when you may conclude that others would like to open up but still don't feel safe. Or maybe they're still in violence, haven't come down from the adrenaline, and aren't explaining why they're angry. When this is the case, you might want to try priming. Prime when you believe that the other person still has something to share and might do so with a little more effort on your part.

REMEMBER YOUR ABCs

Let's say you did your level best to make it safe for the other person to talk. After asking, mirroring, paraphrasing, and eventually priming, the other person opened up and shared his or her path. It's now your turn to talk. But what if you disagree? Some of the other person's facts are wrong, and his or her stories are completely fouled up. Well, at least they're a lot different from the story you've been telling. Now what?

Agree

Most arguments consist of battles over the 5 to 10 percent of the facts and stories that people disagree over. And while it's true that people eventually need to work through differences, you shouldn't start there. Start with an area of agreement. So here's the take-away. If you completely agree with the other person's path, say so and move on. Agree when you agree. Don't turn an agreement into an argument.

Build

When the other person has merely left out an element of the argument, skilled people will agree and then build. Rather than saying: "Wrong. You forgot to mention . . . ," they say: "Absolutely. In addition, I noticed that . . ." If you agree with what has been said but the information is incomplete, build. Point out areas of agreement and then add elements that were left out of the discussion.

Compare

Finally, if you do disagree, compare your path with the other person's . That is, rather than suggesting that he or she is wrong, suggest that you differ. He or she may, in fact, be wrong, but you don't know for sure until you hear both sides of the story. For now, you just know that the two of you differ. So instead of pronouncing "Wrong!" start with a tentative but candid opening such as "I think I see things differently. Let me describe how. "


Chapter 9: Move to Action

How to Turn Crucial Conversations into Action and Results

Up until this point we've suggested that getting more meaning into the pool helps with dialogue. It's the one thing that helps people make savvy decisions that, in turn, lead to smart actions. In order to encourage this free flow of meaning, we've shared the skills we've been able to learn by watching people who are gifted at dialogue. It's time we add two final skills. Having more meaning in the pool, even jointly owning it, doesn't guarantee that we all agree on what we're going to do with the meaning. For example, when teams or families meet and generate a host of ideas, they often fail to convert the ideas into act ion for two reasons:

1. They have unclear Expectations about how decisions will be made.

2. They do a poor job of acting on the decisions they do make.

DIALOGUE IS NOT DECISION MAKING - The two riskiest times in crucial conversations tend to be at the beginning and at the end. The beginning is risky because you have to find a way to create safety or else things go awry. The end is dicey because if you aren't careful about how you clarify the conclusion and decisions flowing from your Pool of Shared Meaning, you can run into violated expectations later on. This can happen in two ways .

1. How are decisions going to be made? First, people may not understand how decisions are going to be made.

2. Are we ever going to decide? The second problem with decision making occurs when no decision gets made. Either ideas slip away and dissipate, or people can't figure out what to do with them. Or maybe everyone is waiting for everyone else to make the decisions.

Decide how to Decide

Both of these problems are solved if, before making a decision, the people involved decide how to decide. Don't allow people to assume that dialogue is decision making. Dialogue is a process for getting all relevant meaning into a shared pool. That process, of course, involves everyone. However, simply because everyone is allowed to share their meaning-actually encouraged to share their meaning-doesn't mean they are then guaranteed to take part in making all the decisions. To avoid violated expectations, separate dialogue from decision making. Make it clear how decisions will be made-who will be involved and why.

 

The Four Methods of Decision Making

When you're deciding how to decide, it helps to have a way of talking about the decision-making options available. There are four common ways of making decisions : command, consult, vote, and consensus. These four options represent increasing degrees of involvement. Increased involvement, of course, brings the benefit of increased commitment along with the curse of decreased decision-making efficiency. Savvy people choose from among these four methods of decision making the one that best suits their particular circumstances.

Command -Let's start with decisions that are made with no involvement whatsoever. This happens in one of two ways. Either outside forces place demands on us (demands that leave us no wiggle room), or we tum decisions over to others and then follow their lead. We don't care enough to be involved-let someone else do the work.

Consult - Consulting is a process whereby decision makers invite others to influence them before they make their choice. You can consult with experts, a representative population, or even everyone who wants to offer an opinion. Consulting can be an efficient way of gaining ideas and support without bogging down the decision making process.

Vote - Voting is best suited to situations where efficiency is the highest value-and you're selecting from a number of good options.

Consensus - This method can be both a great blessing and a frustrating curse. Consensus means you talk until everyone honestly agrees to one decision. This method can produce tremendous unity and high quality decisions. If misapplied, it can also be a horrible waste of time. It should only be used with (1) high-stakes and complex issues or (2) issues where everyone absolutely must support the final choice.

HOW TO CHOOSE

Let's explore which method to use at which time-along with some hints about how to avoid common blunders. When choosing among the four methods of decision making, consider the following questions.

Who cares? - Determine who genuinely wants to be involved in the decision along with those who will be affected. These are your candidates for involvement. Don't involve people who don't care.

Who knows? - Identify who has the expertise you need to make the best decision. Encourage these people to take part. Try not to involve people who contribute no new information.

Who must agree? - Think of those whose cooperation you might need in the form of authority or influence in any decisions you might make. It's better to involve these people than to surprise them and then suffer their open resistance.

How many people is it worth involving? - Your goal should be to involve the fewest number of people while still considering the quality of the decision along with the support that people will give it. Ask: "Do we have enough people to make a good choice? Will others have to be involved to gain their commitment?"

Finish Clearly

Determine who does what by when. Make the deliverables crystal clear. Set a follow-up time. Record the commitments and then follow up. Finally, hold people accountable to their promises.

Who? - Assign a name to every responsibility.

Does What? - Be sure to spell out the exact deliverables you have in mind.

By When? - Establish a clear due date by which the exact deliverables should be done.

How will you follow up? - Always agree on how often and by what method you'll follow up on the assignment.


Chapter 10: Putting it All Together

Tools for Preparing and Learning

 

You may well be wondering at this point how you can possibly keep all these ideas straight -especially during something as unpredictable and fast moving as a crucial conversation. This chapter will help with the daunting task of making dialogue tools and skills memorable and usable. First, we'll simplify things by sharing what we've heard from people who have changed their lives by using these skills. Second, we'll lay out a model that can help you visually organize the seven dialogue principles. Third, we'll walk through an example of a crucial conversation where all the dialogue principles are applied.

After watching people at home and at work, as well as interviewing them, we've learned that most people make progress not by focusing on specific skills-at least to start with-but instead by applying two of the main principles in this book.

Learn to Look

The first lever for positive change is Learn to Look. That is, people who improve their dialogue skills continually ask themselves whether they're in or out of dialogue. Even people who can't remember or never learned the skills of STATE or CRIB, etc., are able to benefit from this material by simply asking if they're falling into silence or violence. They may not know exactly how to fix the specific problem they're facing, but they do know that if they're not in dialogue, it can't be good. And then they try something to get back to dialogue. As it turns out, trying something is better than doing nothing.

So remember to ask the following important question: "Are we playing games or are we in dialogue?" It's a wonderful start.

Perhaps the most common way that the language of dialogue finds itself into everyday conversation is with the expression, "I think we've moved away from dialogue." This simple reminder helps people catch themselves early on, before the damage is severe.

Make It Safe

The second lever is Make It Safe. We've suggested that dialogue consists of the free flow of meaning and that the number one flow stopper is a lack of safety. When you notice that you and others have moved away from dialogue, do something to make it safer. Anything. We've suggested a few skills, but those are merely a handful of common practices. There many things you can do to increase safety. If you simply realize that your challenge is to make it safer, nine out of ten times you'll intuitively do something that helps.

Sometimes you'll build safety by asking a question and showing interest in others' views. Apologies, smiles, even a request for a brief "time out" can help restore safety when things get dicey. The main idea is to make it safe. Do something to make others comfortable. And remember, virtually every skill we've covered in this book, from Contrasting to CRIB, offers a tool for building safety.

These two levers form the basis for recognizing, building, and maintaining dialogue. When the concept of dialogue is introduced, these are the ideas most people can readily take in and apply to crucial conversations.

If we first learn to recognize when safety is at risk and a conversation becomes crucial (Learn to Look) and that we need to take steps to Make It Safe for everyone to contribute his or her meaning, we can begin to see where to apply the skills we've learned. A visual model can also help us see where the principles and skills are needed. Using these tools and reminders will get us started in mastering the skills that help us improve our crucial conversations.

Click on the image below to download the Coaching for Crucial Conversations worksheet PDF.


Chapter 11: Yeah, But

Advice for Tough Cases

 

As we (the authors) have taught this material, we've grown accustomed to people saying, "Yeah, but my situation's more difficult than that !" Or "Yeah, but the people I deal with aren't so quick to come around. Besides, most of the problems I face come as a surprise. I'm caught off guard." In short, people can think of a dozen reasons why the skills we've been talking about don't apply to the situations they care about.

In truth, the dialogue skills we've shared apply to just about any problem you can imagine. However, since some are more difficult than others, we've chosen some tough cases. We'll take a moment to share a thought or two on each.

FAILURE TO LIVE UP TO AGREEMENTS

YEAH, BUT...MY TEAMMATES ARE hypocrites. We get together and talk about all the ways we could improve, but then people don't do what they agreed to. "

The Danger Point - The worst teams walk away from problems like these. In good teams, the boss eventually deals with problem behavior. In the best teams, every team member is part of the system of accountability. If team members see others violate a team agreement, they speak up immediately and directly. It's dangerous to wait for or expect the boss to do what good teammates should do themselves.

The Solution - If your teammate isn't doing what you think he or she should, it's up to you to speak up. When teams try to rally around aggressive change or bold new initiatives, they need to be prepared to address the problem when a team member doesn't live up to the agreement. Success does not depend on perfect compliance with new expectations, but on teammates who hold crucial conversations with one another when others appear to be reverting to old patterns.

SHOWS NO INITIATIVE

"YEAH, BUT...SOME MEMBERS OF MY WORK TEAM do what they're asked, but no more. If they run into a problem, they take one simple slab at fixing it. But if their efforts don't pay off, they quit."

The Danger Point - Most people are far more likely to talk about the presence of a bad behavior than the absence of a good one. When someone really messes up, leaders and parents alike are compelled to take action. However, when people simply fail to be excellent, it's hard to know what to say.

The Solution - Establish new and higher expectations. Don't deal with a specific instance; deal with the overall pattern. If you want someone to show more initiative, tell him or her. Give specific examples of when the person ran into a barrier and then backed off after a single try. Raise the bar and then make it crystal clear what you've done. Jointly brainstorm what the person could have done to be both more persistent and more creative in coming up with a solution.

Pay attention to ways you are compensating for someone's lack of initiative. Have you made yourself responsible for following up? If so, talk with that person about assuming this responsibility. Have you asked more than one person to take the same assignment so you can be sure it will get done? If so, talk to the person originally assigned about reporting progress to you early so you only need to put someone else on the job when there's a clear need for more resources.

Stop acting out your expectations that others won't take initiative. Instead, talk your expectations out and come to agreements that place the responsibility on the team members while giving you information early enough that you aren't left high and dry.

SHOWS A PATTERN

YEAH, BUT...IT ISN'T A SINGLE PROBLEM. It's that I keep having to talk with people about the same problem. I feel like I have to choose between being a nag and putting up with the problem. Now what?"

The Danger Point - Some crucial conversations go poorly because you're having the wrong conversations. You talk to someone who is late for a meeting for the second time, Then the third. Your blood begins to boil. Then you bite your lip and give another gentle reminder. Finally, after your resentment builds up (because you're telling yourself an ugly story) , you become violent. You make a sarcastic or cutting comment and then end up looking stupid because the reaction seems way out of line given the minor offense.

The Solution - Learn to Look for patterns. Don't focus exclusively on a single event. Watch for behavior over time. Then STATE Your Path by talking about the pattern. For example, if a person is late for meetings and agrees to do better, the next conversation should not be about tardiness. It should be about his or her failure to keep a commitment. This is a bigger issue. It's now about trust and respect. People often become far more emotional than the issue they're discussing warrants because they're talking about the wrong issue. If you're really bothered because of a pattern, but you're talking about this latest instance, your emotions will seem out of proportion. In contrast, an interesting thing happens when you hold the right conversation. Your emotions calm down. When you talk about what's really eating you-the pattern-you'll be able to be more composed and effective. Don't get pulled into any one instance or your concern will seem trivial. Talk about the overall pattern.


Chapter 12: Change Your Life

How to Turn Ideas into Habits

 

Real change doesn't come easy. There are several enemies to change that prevent us adopting the skills learned here during a crucial conversation. Surprise, Emotion, and Scripts are three enemies of change that have to be overcome to embed the changes recommended in Crucial Conversations. In order to bring about real change you have to Master the Content, Master the Skills, Enhance your Motive, and Watch for Cues. Finally, reinforce what you've learned in Crucial Conversations by watching/listening to examples of the content and skills on crucialconversations.com, review the chapters one at a time, and focus on a specific skill that you want to enhance and work on it, then move on to the next.

"To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often." - Winston Churchill

Enemies to Change

Surprise - As opposed to meetings, which can be planned, scheduled, pinned to a selected location, and easily identified; crucial conversations are usually spontaneous, can happen anywhere, and happen before you can even identify that you're in one. In short, crucial conversations are often a surprise and catch us off guard. Nobody sends you an invitation stating: "Would you please engage me in a crucial conversation next week after the team meeting where you're going to make a policy that will miff me?" High-risk discussions don't come with notices and reminders. More often than not, they come as unwelcome surprises.

Emotion - Emotions don't help much either. And, of course, crucial conversations are defined by their emotional characteristics . Your ability to pull yourself out of the content of a discussion and to focus on the process is inversely proportional to your level of emotion. The more you care about what's happening, the less likely you are to think about how you're conducting yourself. It's almost unfair. The bigger the deal, the less likely you are to bring your newly acquired skill-set into the conversation. Like it or not, if your adrenaline is flowing, you're almost guaranteed to jump to your Style Under Stress. Between surprise and emotion, it's hard to know which is the bigger enemy of change. Both make it hard to remember to act in new ways.

Scripts - Scripts are pre-bundled phrases we use in common conversations; they form the very foundation of social habits and often make change almost impossible. Consider the following. When we learn to speak, first come words, then phrases, and then scripts. The larger the bundles of words we carry around, the less we have to worry about combining them into sensible expressions. Also the less we have to fret over syntax or grammar-that work has already been done for us. Unfortunately, predetermined expressions also put us into a sort of mental autopilot. Consider what happens when you walk into a fast-food restaurant. Do you think about the words you'll choose? Probably not. That's because when you enter familiar circumstances, you're carrying not only words and phrases, but an entire script in your head.

Transfer Tips

First, Master the Content - That means not only do you have to be able to recognize what works and why, but you have to generate new scripts of your own.

Do something. Years ago, Dale Carnegie recommended that you read his now classic How to Win Friends and Influence People one chapter at a time. Then, once you finished the chapter,

he suggested you go out and practice what you learned from it. We agree. Pick a chapter you found relevant (possibly one with a low score in your Style Under Stress test) and read it again. This time, implement what you learned over a three- to five-day period. Look for opportunities. Pounce on every chance you get. Step up to the plate and give the skills a try. Then pick another chapter and repeat the process.

Discuss the material. When you first learn something, your knowledge is "pre-verbal." That is, you might recognize the concepts if you see them, but you're not able to discuss them with ease. You haven't talked about them enough to make them part of your functional vocabulary. You haven't turned the words into phrases and the phrases into scripts. To move your knowledge to the next level, read a chapter and then discuss it with a friend or loved one. Talk about the material until the concepts come naturally.

Teach the material. If you really want to master a concept, teach it to someone else. Stick with it until the other person understands the concept well enough to pass it on to someone else.

Second, Master the Skills - You must be able to enact these new scripts in a way that is consistent with the supporting principles. As it turns out, simply understanding a concept isn't enough. While it's helpful , even necessary to talk the talk, you have to be able to walk the talk. You have to be able to say the right words with the right tone and nonverbal actions. When it comes to social skills, knowing and doing are two different animals.

Rehearse with a friend. Start by rehearsing with a friend. Ask a colleague or coworker to partner with you. Explain that you'd like to practice the skills you're learning. Briefly discuss the skill you'll be attempting. Provide the details of a real problem you're facing. (Don't include names or otherwise violate privacy issues.) Next, ask your friend to play the role of the other person and practice the crucial conversation. Ask your partner to give you honest feedback. Otherwise you could be practicing the wrong delivery. Remember, practice doesn't make perfect; perfect practice makes perfect. Insist that your practice partner hold you to a high standard. Make sure you're constantly improving.

Practice on the fly. You're going to be holding crucial conversations at home and at work, or you wouldn't have bought this book in the first place . So practice the skills you've been reading, teaching, and rehearsing. If you have children, hardly a day will pass that you won't have a chance to practice. Start immediately. If you wait until you're perfect before you give something a try, you could be waiting a long time. To make it safe, pick a conversation of only medium risk. Trying out something new is hard enough without applying it to a monumental problem.

Third, Enhance your Motives - You must want to change. This means that you have to care enough about improving your crucial conversation skills to actually do something. You have to move from a passive sense that it would be a good idea to change, to an active desire to seek opportunities. Ability without motive lies dormant and untapped.

Apply incentives. Start with the obvious. Use incentives. For example, people going through self-help courses are often encouraged to put their money where their mouth is. Every time they fulfill an assignment, they're given back a portion of their tuition. On the other hand, if they don't step up, it costs them. When incentives are added, results improve fairly dramatically.

Apply disincentives. You might consider disincentives as well. Take a look at what went on at Stanford a few years back. Subjects who were trying to lose weight were asked to write a donation check to an organization they despised. These checks were then set aside, never to be mailed unless the subjects failed to live up to their goals-at which point five hundred dollars was sent to Americans for Nuclear Proliferation or something equally distasteful to the subject. As predicted, subjects did better when they used disincentives.

Go Public. Let others know that you're trying to routinely hold crucial conversations. Explain what you're doing and why. Over half a century ago, Dr. Kurt Lewin, the father of social psychology, learned that when subjects made a public commitment to do something, they were more likely to stay the course than if they kept their wishes to themselves. Tell people what your goals are. Get social pressure working in your favor.

Talk with your boss. If you want to take it a step further, sit down with your boss and explain your goals. Ask for his or her support. If you want to put some real teeth into your goal, build your plan into your performance review. As a leader, you're almost always asked to pick one "soft area" listed on your performance review forms and work on it. Select dialogue. You might as well tie your plans for improvement into the formal reward system. Align your personal, family, and organizational goals to a single goal-improving your dialogue skills.

Remember the costs; focus on the reward. Perhaps the most predictive piece of social science research ever conducted was completed with small children and marshmallows. A child was put in a room and then told that he or she could have either one marshmallow now or two if he or she was willing to wait until the adult returned in a few minutes. The adult would then place one marshmallow in front of the child and exit. Some of the children delayed gratification. Others ate the marshmallow right away. Researchers continued studying these children. Over the next several decades, the children who had delayed gratification ended up doing far better in life than those who hadn't. They had stronger marriages, made more money, and were healthier.3 This willingness to do without now in order to achieve more later turns out to be an all-purpose tool for success. How did the children who were able to delay gratification fight off their short-term wishes? First, they looked away from the scrumptious marshmallow that sat in front of them. No use torturing themselves with the vision of what they couldn't have. Second, they kept telling themselves that if they waited, they would get two, not one. What could be simpler? As you step up to a crucial conversation and wonder if it's really worth trying out something new and untested, remind yourself why you're trying new skills in the first place. Focus on improved results. Remember what happens when you fall back on your old methods.

Fourth, Watch for Cues - To overcome surprise, emotion, and scripts, you must recognize the call to action. This is usually people's biggest obstacle to change. Old stimuli generate old responses. if a problem doesn't cue your new skills, you'll return to your old habits without even realizing you missed a chance to try something new.

Mark hot spots. People who go through stress-reduction training learn to mark physical items that are closely linked to their sources of tension. People who freak out in traffic put a small red circle on their steering wheel. Individuals who are constantly in a rush put one on their watch. When it comes to the tough conversations you face, you might want to make use of small visual cues as well. Place one on the computer that spits out results that drive you nuts. Build a cue into your copy of the agenda of any meeting that typically serves up tough problems.

Set aside a time. Perhaps the best way to remind yourself to use your new skills is to set aside a time each day to walk around in search of both successes and problems. When you see a success, celebrate. When you encounter a problem, bring your best dialogue tools into play.

Read reactions. If you're not doing a good job of holding crucial conversations, the results are going to be right in front of you. If you see that you're getting off track, back up and start over. Use real-life cues (e.g., the other person's jaw tenses, he or she clams up, etc.) to remind yourself that maybe it's time to try a new tactic. If necessary, apologize. Move to an earlier place in the discussion and follow the process.

Build in permanent reminders. Order a poster of the model, place it on the wall, and look at it each morning as you start the day.

Carry a reminder. Along with the poster, order a set of cue cards you can tuck into your purse or shirt pocket.

A PARTING THOUGHT

We encourage you to pick a relationship. Pick a conversation. Let others know that you're trying to do better, then give it a shot. When you blow it, admit it. Don't expect perfection; aim for progress. And when you succeed, celebrate your success. We hope you'll take pleasure in knowing that you're improving and so are your relationships. Finally, when the chance arises, help others do the same. Help friends, loved ones, and coworkers learn to master their own high-stakes discussions. Help strengthen organizations, solidify families, heal communities, and shore up nations one person-one crucial conversation-at a time.